, but this code // executes before the first paint, when

麻豆区

is not yet present. The // classes are added to so styling immediately reflects the current // toolbar state. The classes are removed after the toolbar completes // initialization. const classesToAdd = ['toolbar-loading', 'toolbar-anti-flicker']; if (toolbarState) { const { orientation, hasActiveTab, isFixed, activeTray, activeTabId, isOriented, userButtonMinWidth } = toolbarState; classesToAdd.push( orientation ? `toolbar-` + orientation + `` : 'toolbar-horizontal', ); if (hasActiveTab !== false) { classesToAdd.push('toolbar-tray-open'); } if (isFixed) { classesToAdd.push('toolbar-fixed'); } if (isOriented) { classesToAdd.push('toolbar-oriented'); } if (activeTray) { // These styles are added so the active tab/tray styles are present // immediately instead of "flickering" on as the toolbar initializes. In // instances where a tray is lazy loaded, these styles facilitate the // lazy loaded tray appearing gracefully and without reflow. const styleContent = ` .toolbar-loading #` + activeTabId + ` { background-image: linear-gradient(rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.25) 20%, transparent 200%); } .toolbar-loading #` + activeTabId + `-tray { display: block; box-shadow: -1px 0 5px 2px rgb(0 0 0 / 33%); border-right: 1px solid #aaa; background-color: #f5f5f5; z-index: 0; } .toolbar-loading.toolbar-vertical.toolbar-tray-open #` + activeTabId + `-tray { width: 15rem; height: 100vh; } .toolbar-loading.toolbar-horizontal :not(#` + activeTray + `) > .toolbar-lining {opacity: 0}`; const style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = styleContent; style.setAttribute('data-toolbar-anti-flicker-loading', true); document.querySelector('head').appendChild(style); if (userButtonMinWidth) { const userButtonStyle = document.createElement('style'); userButtonStyle.textContent = `#toolbar-item-user {min-width: ` + userButtonMinWidth +`px;}` document.querySelector('head').appendChild(userButtonStyle); } } } document.querySelector('html').classList.add(...classesToAdd); })(); Calvin named to 2009 Princeton Review guide - News & Stories | 麻豆区

麻豆区

Skip to main content

Calvin News

Calvin named to 2009 Princeton Review guide

Tue, Jul 15, 2008
Phil de Haan

Calvin College has been included in the 2009 edition of The Princeton Review's annual college guide Best 368 Colleges. Only about 15 percent of the nation's four-year colleges are included in the guide which was first published in 1992.

The Princeton Review's annual guide depends heavily on student surveys to both form the two-page profiles of each of the 368 schools included and to create a series of unusual secondary lists. Calvin's profile leads with what the college's undergrads told the Princeton Review.

The books calls Calvin not just a college with a Christian label, but rather a Christian community that challenges academically as well as spiritually. The result, said the Princeton Review, is serious academics from a Christian perspective capable of training students to engage thoughtfully with the world around them. Calvin's two-page profile also makes note of the resources available to students at Calvin, including spectacular research facilities. 鈥淏est of all,鈥 said the profile, 鈥淐alvin students receive all these perks without forfeiting the personal attention students understandably expect at a small private school.鈥

As for the always-popular, and often quirky, lists, Calvin made seven for 2009, including:

Stone-Cold Sober Schools (10)

Scotch and Soda, Hold the Scotch (11)

Most Religious Students (12)

Alternative Lifestyles Not an Alternative (15)

Don鈥檛 Inhale (15)

Got Milk? (16)

Future Rotarians and Daughters of the American Revolution (17)



The Princeton Review notes, however, that those rankings are not a comparison vs every school in the country, but rather denote where schools fit in when compared only to the other schools in the 2009 guide.

鈥淚n our opinion, each school in this book is first-rate academically,鈥 said Robert Franek, senior vice president and publisher of The Princeton Review. 鈥淏ut their campus cultures and offerings differ greatly. Instead of ranking schools academically, we tally ranking lists in 62 categories based on what students at the schools (their customers) report to us about them. We also compile rating scores in eight categories based on institutional data we collect. We believe college applicants need to know far more about schools than an academic ranking to identify which colleges may be best for them. It's all about the fit.鈥

The 62 ranking lists are based on surveys of 120,000 students (average 325 per campus) at the 368 schools in the book. The 80-question survey asks students about their school's academics, administration, campus life, student body and more.